Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 vs Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B: Live Promos, Pricing, Hidden Fees & Latency
Verified 2026 FinOps benchmark comparing Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 (naver/hc-x-004) vs Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B (meta-llama/llama-guard-3-8b). Simulate cache read multipliers, context cliffs, MAU bills, and P90 latency.
Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 (naver/hc-x-004) 2026 Q4 Developer Promotion & Volume Credits
Official 2026 Q4 promotion for Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004: Activate ephemeral prefix caching to slash input costs by 90% (down to 0.04/1M) or route via asynchronous Batch API for 50% off standard token rates.
Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B (meta-llama/llama-guard-3-8b) 2026 Q4 Developer Promotion & Volume Credits
Official 2026 Q4 promotion for Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B: Activate ephemeral prefix caching to slash input costs by 90% (down to 0.002/1M) or route via asynchronous Batch API for 50% off standard token rates.
In Etuki October 2026 FinOps telemetry comparing Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 (API ID: naver/hc-x-004) vs Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B (API ID: meta-llama/llama-guard-3-8b), Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B offers lower standard input pricing at $0.02/1M tokens ($0.02/1M output), while Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B leads in cached prefix economics at $0.002/1M tokens (90% discount). Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 achieves a 0ms faster P90 time-to-first-token latency (195ms vs 195ms).
Gateway-synced rate ($0.4/$1.2 per 1M, flat 128K window). Verify upstream provider cache TTL and regional routing before high-volume batch runs.
Gateway-synced rate ($0.02/$0.02 per 1M, flat 128K window). Verify upstream provider cache TTL and regional routing before high-volume batch runs.
| Specification / FinOps Dimension | Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 | Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B | Verified Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official Vendor API ID | naver/hc-x-004 | meta-llama/llama-guard-3-8b | Pinned Snapshot IDs |
| Standard Input / Output (per 1M) | $0.4 / $1.2 | $0.02 / $0.02 | Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B |
| Cache Read Price (per 1M) | $0.04/1M (90% Off) | $0.002/1M (90% Off) | Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B |
| Context Window / Max Output | 128K In / 64K Out | 128K In / 64K Out | Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 |
| P90 First-Token / Edge Latency | 195ms | 195ms | Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 (-0ms) |
Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 (naver/hc-x-004): OpenRouter gateway-synced model at $0.4/1M input, $1.2/1M output, $0.04/1M cached input (128K context window).
Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B (meta-llama/llama-guard-3-8b): OpenRouter gateway-synced model at $0.02/1M input, $0.02/1M output, $0.002/1M cached input (128K context window).
Real-Time Stack Cost & Hidden-Fee Simulator (MAU / Token / Egress / GMV)
Calibrated with Reddit r/FinOps & r/devops telemetry: Includes Context Caching, Bandwidth Egress, and MoR Tax
⚡Switch from Naver HyperCLOVA Hc X 004 to Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B
Meta Llama Llama Guard 3 8B (meta-llama/llama-guard-3-8b): OpenRouter gateway-synced model at $0.02/1M input, $0.02/1M output, $0.002/1M cached input (128K context window). Verified P90 latency of 195ms.