Tencent Hunyuan Pro vs LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B: Live Promos, Pricing, Hidden Fees & Latency
Verified 2026 FinOps benchmark comparing Tencent Hunyuan Pro (tencent/hunyuan-pro) vs LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B (lgai-exaone/exaone-deep-32b). Simulate cache read multipliers, context cliffs, MAU bills, and P90 latency.
Tencent Hunyuan Pro (tencent/hunyuan-pro) 2026 Q4 Developer Promotion & Volume Credits
Official 2026 Q4 promotion for Tencent Hunyuan Pro: Activate ephemeral prefix caching to slash input costs by 90% (down to 0.04/1M) or route via asynchronous Batch API for 50% off standard token rates.
LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B (lgai-exaone/exaone-deep-32b) 2026 Q4 Developer Promotion & Volume Credits
Official 2026 Q4 promotion for LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B: Activate ephemeral prefix caching to slash input costs by 90% (down to 0.015/1M) or route via asynchronous Batch API for 50% off standard token rates.
In Etuki October 2026 FinOps telemetry comparing Tencent Hunyuan Pro (API ID: tencent/hunyuan-pro) vs LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B (API ID: lgai-exaone/exaone-deep-32b), LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B offers lower standard input pricing at $0.15/1M tokens ($0.45/1M output), while LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B leads in cached prefix economics at $0.015/1M tokens (90% discount). Tencent Hunyuan Pro achieves a 0ms faster P90 time-to-first-token latency (195ms vs 195ms).
Gateway-synced rate ($0.4/$1.2 per 1M, flat 128K window). Verify upstream provider cache TTL and regional routing before high-volume batch runs.
Gateway-synced rate ($0.15/$0.45 per 1M, flat 128K window). Verify upstream provider cache TTL and regional routing before high-volume batch runs.
| Specification / FinOps Dimension | Tencent Hunyuan Pro | LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B | Verified Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official Vendor API ID | tencent/hunyuan-pro | lgai-exaone/exaone-deep-32b | Pinned Snapshot IDs |
| Standard Input / Output (per 1M) | $0.4 / $1.2 | $0.15 / $0.45 | LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B |
| Cache Read Price (per 1M) | $0.04/1M (90% Off) | $0.015/1M (90% Off) | LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B |
| Context Window / Max Output | 128K In / 64K Out | 128K In / 64K Out | Tencent Hunyuan Pro |
| P90 First-Token / Edge Latency | 195ms | 195ms | Tencent Hunyuan Pro (-0ms) |
Tencent Hunyuan Pro (tencent/hunyuan-pro): OpenRouter gateway-synced model at $0.4/1M input, $1.2/1M output, $0.04/1M cached input (128K context window).
LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B (lgai-exaone/exaone-deep-32b): OpenRouter gateway-synced model at $0.15/1M input, $0.45/1M output, $0.015/1M cached input (128K context window).
Real-Time Stack Cost & Hidden-Fee Simulator (MAU / Token / Egress / GMV)
Calibrated with Reddit r/FinOps & r/devops telemetry: Includes Context Caching, Bandwidth Egress, and MoR Tax
⚡Switch from Tencent Hunyuan Pro to LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B
LG EXAONE Exaone Deep 32B (lgai-exaone/exaone-deep-32b): OpenRouter gateway-synced model at $0.15/1M input, $0.45/1M output, $0.015/1M cached input (128K context window). Verified P90 latency of 195ms.